Overview
Our current ECE system is marked by the lack of cohesion between the various funding streams supporting children ages 0-5. The result of these disjointed systems is instability for programs, the workforce, and families.
Search Site
What Is Funding Equity
Our current ECE system is marked by the lack of cohesion between the various funding streams supporting children ages 0-5. The result of these disjointed systems is instability for programs, the workforce, and families.
Split ownership of the early childhood system does not allow for the ECEC system to be intentionally designed, resulting in inequitable distribution of service availability.
When separate data systems have been built for siloed early childhood programs, they are not integrated to effectively inform equitable decision-making and funding. Ultimately, state policymakers cannot allocate resources in a way that generates greater equity because they cannot see the full picture, and because of this, the early childhood system lacks comprehensive transparency and accountability.
At the community level, there is typically no entity that has responsibility for planning comprehensively for ECEC services, causing community disruption when “competing” programs are added or service shortages arise.
Many providers offer services managed by multiple agencies and receive multiple funding streams with incongruous accountability and reporting requirements. Providers are left to meet various standards within their programs based on funding stream requirements, which at best are unaligned but often are incompatible. The result is inequitable services because of the different demands and expectations required by specific grant/funding sources.
Funding mechanisms are complex, making the system incredibly burdensome and often impossible for providers to navigate. Major state-administered funding streams are provided as reimbursements and/or are subject to long payment delays, leaving providers struggling to make ends meet, as they simply do not receive enough funding in a timely, consistent manner.
The low compensation of ECEC professionals has led to a severe and growing shortage of qualified staff for ECEC programs.
Directors of different ECEC programs all report that filling vacancies has become exceedingly difficult and implementing key equity-focused strategies has been significantly hampered by too-slow growth in the number of teachers with these qualifications.
Indeed, the number of students completing degrees in Early Childhood Education and related fields has been decreasing in recent years, a trend that must be reversed if the field is to scale access for all families.
Families with young children are essentially left to navigate this incoherent system on their own. There is no single source of information about ECEC options, and families must navigate the current disjointed system on their own without full transparency or a cohesive support structure.
Lack of unified quality standards or accountability mechanisms limits a family’s ability to know where quality options exist, what options are available to help them afford ECEC, and what level of quality available services provide.
Navigating the complex system is even more burdensome for families who do not speak English as a first language, which could be compounded further if there is dependence on literacy and/or technological skills.
Understanding the Current Early Childhood Education and Care Ecosystem in Illinois